View Poll Results: Do you want wiki results at the top of Google for informational searches?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I want wiki results

    8 44.44%
  • No, I do not want wiki results

    10 55.56%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Google to Partner with Wikipedia?

  1. #1

    Default Google to Partner with Wikipedia?

    Check out this find by Oilman http://www.oilman.ca/google/googlepedia/

    So far in our limited research we’ve found that ‘information’ and ‘info’ searches seem to trigger Wikipedia entries at #1.
    Is this Good or Bad ?
    Barry Schwartz, CEO of RustyBrick, Inc. & Editor of the Search Engine Roundtable.

  2. #2

    Default

    Barry Schwartz, CEO of RustyBrick, Inc. & Editor of the Search Engine Roundtable.

  3. #3

    Default

    I feel like I should say No, because that seems to be the SEO kind of thing to say. However, from a user's point of view, I actually like it. I often go straight to wikipedia when I need information about what something is. So this would be a natural for me. I realize that it takes away from all of our beloved sites, so the SEO in me cringes at the idea, but I honestly like it from a user standpoint.

  4. #4

    Default does the query need to have "information" or "info" in it?

    does the query need to have "information" or "info" in it to trigger a wikipedia result on the top of the SERP?

  5. #5

    Default

    Like DD says I like it from a users perspective. Though I have a few issues:

    Wiki is not accurate and open to abuse.
    Its unlikely to be anywhere close to definitive (most sites on the topic will probably contain more indepth info)

  6. #6

    Default

    Wiki is not accurate and open to abuse.
    According to a recent study Wiki is equally accurate as Encyclopedia Britanica.

    Its unlikely to be anywhere close to definitive
    That's why other sites are listed below the Wiki. It's not like Google is replacing the entire SERP with a Wiki article.

    Having said that I still dont like what it'll do to my traffic but it's convenient from a usability percpective.
    -PK
    Stomp Stomp Stomp Stomp.....

  7. #7

    Default

    Of all the competitors in my space, there is not a one that I worry about more than Wikipedia. Anybody who can hold them off long term either has powerful mojo or voodoo working in their favor. I don't believe in voodoo so I better start working extra hard.
    It's not the size of the dog in the fight that matters. It's the size of the fight in the dog.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EGOL
    Of all the competitors in my space, there is not a one that I worry about more than Wikipedia.
    Any genuine longterm ideas on how to deal with it ?

    Fight fire with fire ? ...build niche wikis perhaps ?

  9. Default

    I don't know but content vs information is the key in my mind.. Us seo generally give content not info.. and the content comes at a commerical cost to the user..

    google is about giving info but yeh its a fine line between info vs content just imho

  10. #10

    Default

    It's great for users and I'm one of them so it's a thumbs up.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •